logo enlogo enlogo enlogo en
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • History
    • Partners
    • Our Team
    • Contact form
  • Our Work
    • Forests
    • Rivers and other wetlands
    • Red list species and species invasion
    • Protected Areas and local communities
    • Eco-education
    • Legal support
    • War in Ukraine
  • Projects
    • Current projects
  • News and Publications
    • News
    • Publications
    • Media about us
    • Video
  • Get Involved
    • Public initiatives
    • Live green
    • DONATE
  • Contact us
  • Donate
  • ENG
    • UA
    • ENG
  • Головна
  • News
  • A Ten-Step Plan to Address the Environmental Impact of the War in Ukraine
SkyNews: What damage is Putin’s war doing to the Planet?
February 28, 2023
Newspaper Svit: Where to plant white acacia and red oak?
March 3, 2023

A Ten-Step Plan to Address the Environmental Impact of the War in Ukraine

March 1, 2023

Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine has been going on for more than a year. The war not only causes terrible suffering among people in Ukraine, but also has a significant impact on the environment and biodiversity.

European and Ukrainian NGOs made a joint statement to the international community with 10 steps that will reduce harm to civilians and reduce the harmful impact of war on the environment.

Recommendations
  1. Strengthen Ukraine’s emergency response capacity. A crucial step to prevent and mitigate serious
    pollution incidents at hazardous facilities, which includes the repair of damaged critical infrastructure, the
    clearance of mines and unexploded ordnance, and land remediation measures at affected sites.
  2.  Secure the demilitarization and de-occupation of the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. All actors
    must refrain from using this facility for military purposes. This is the most effective way to prevent a
    catastrophic nuclear accident.
  1. Support ongoing work to identify, document and assess environmental damage and its impact on public
    health. Stakeholders, including international organizations, academia and civil society are monitoring harm.
    Improving coordination of this work and complementing it with on-site assessment of contaminated areas
    and health surveillance is crucial to address current and future environmental and related public health
    issues. Such foundational work must be systematically supported.
  2. Humanitarian actors and demining organizations should address environmental factors in their field
    operations. This should include the identification and integration of environmental risks, as well as the
    unintended environmental consequences of response operations.
  3. Develop mechanisms and structures to ensure accountability for the damage to Ukraine’s environment.
    This includes support for the collection and archiving of evidence, the identification of best practice for
    environmental reparations, as well as developing the international architecture required for state
    accountability for environmental damage.
  4. Ensure Ukraine’s recovery is green and sustainable. With hundreds of billions of dollars already earmarked
    for the cost of recovery and reconstruction of Ukraine, it is vital that concerns about climate change,
    biodiversity loss and pollution are considered, and that the reconstruction is carried out in a way that
    prevents the further degradation of Ukraine’s environment.
  5. Mainstream environmental protection in military doctrine. With the war ongoing, Ukraine’s military and
    supporting international actors should ensure that policies aimed at minimizing damage to the environment
    are integrated into training and planning, and share targeting data, where possible, with relevant authorities
    and organizations to improve effective environmental response.
  6. Maintain visibility for the environmental dimensions of the war. States and non-state actors should
    raise the environmental dimensions of the war in Ukraine in discussions at all relevant multilateral fora
    and international agreements, and as part of wider exchanges on both the peace and security and
    protection of civilians’ agendas.
  7. Address the impact of war on the climate. The war’s direct emissions, and those linked to shifts in
    regional and global energy supplies, have highlighted the importance of addressing military and conflict
    emissions in the context of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and in debates
    on climate change and security.
  8. Develop a global Environment, Peace and Security agenda. This war has highlighted the risks that
    armed conflicts create for both the local and global environment; lessons must be identified and used to
    underpin a more coherent and coordinated UN-wide approach to the environmental dimensions of armed
    conflicts.February 24, 2023

 

Signed by:

PAX
Conflict and Environment Observatory
Zoï Environment Network
ICO “Environment – People – Law”
Resource & Analysis Center “Society and Environment”
NGO “Ukrainian Nature Conservation Group”
Centre for Environmental Initiatives “Ecoaction”
NGO “Danube-Carpathian Programme”
Razom We Stand
CEE Bankwatch
DIXI Group

Related posts

March 17, 2023

Hukhas are the guardians of nature of the ancient Ukrainians


Read more
March 6, 2023

How do the Carpathians sound: How do the Carpathian rivers save from garbage?


Read more
March 4, 2023

The uniqueness and richness of the Svidovets array: plants


Read more

Contacts


NGO “Danube-Carpathian Programme”


Yuri Mushak Street, 42
Lviv, Lviv region, 79011, Ukraine

Monday-Friday
9:00 - 18:00

Saturday-Sunday
holiday

dcp@natureexperts.org


Тел: +38-067-353-38-13

Тел: +38-068-136-11-21

Follow us

Join us

  • DONATE
  • Public initiatives
  • Live green
www.natureexperts.org © All Rights Reserved